<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .carbonFiber Reinforced Neck*</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guitarworks.thestrandbergs.com/2010/02/18/carbon-fiber-reinforced-neck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guitarworks.thestrandbergs.com/2010/02/18/carbon-fiber-reinforced-neck/</link>
	<description>Handcrafted guitars by Ola Strandberg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:40:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ola Strandberg</title>
		<link>http://guitarworks.thestrandbergs.com/2010/02/18/carbon-fiber-reinforced-neck/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Ola Strandberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitarworks.thestrandbergs.com/?p=761#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex,
yes, I will keep the CF intact. And, I will have an adjustable truss rod, since I believe different players will want different action, and different string gaugues and climates will require it (assuming it is not 100% stiff...) The plan is to use a Martin-style box rod, which is made of aluminum and should be lighter than a regular double-action rod.

If anything, I think hollowing out the neck will make it respond faster. Time will tell... My current trapezoidal neck is quite hollow due to the CF tube (inner diam 12 mm) and works very well.

/Ola</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex,<br />
yes, I will keep the CF intact. And, I will have an adjustable truss rod, since I believe different players will want different action, and different string gaugues and climates will require it (assuming it is not 100% stiff&#8230;) The plan is to use a Martin-style box rod, which is made of aluminum and should be lighter than a regular double-action rod.</p>
<p>If anything, I think hollowing out the neck will make it respond faster. Time will tell&#8230; My current trapezoidal neck is quite hollow due to the CF tube (inner diam 12 mm) and works very well.</p>
<p>/Ola</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Oest</title>
		<link>http://guitarworks.thestrandbergs.com/2010/02/18/carbon-fiber-reinforced-neck/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Oest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitarworks.thestrandbergs.com/?p=761#comment-423</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a brilliant idea laminating that way. Will you keep the carbon intact when hollowing out the neck. Btw, do you expect the hollow neck to do anything to the sound? And, will it have a truss rod?

I am eager to know, so I am looking forward to the update.

/Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a brilliant idea laminating that way. Will you keep the carbon intact when hollowing out the neck. Btw, do you expect the hollow neck to do anything to the sound? And, will it have a truss rod?</p>
<p>I am eager to know, so I am looking forward to the update.</p>
<p>/Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

